Adam and Eve: Genetic Science Confirms Bible Again

The Bible and its account of origins is treated with utter contempt by cultural elites, those who look down their long noses at the rubes and hayseeds (like me) who place great confidence in the Book.

Well, the elites better hope their snobbish peers don’t get their hands on the report about the latest in genetic science. The reason: genetic scientists are telling us now that there is powerful and virtually irrefutable scientific evidence that every human being on earth has descended from a single pair of parents. The Bible, of course, goes science one better, and even gives us the names of our original ancestors, “Adam” and “Eve.”

Note this headline from the Daily Mail, one of the UK’s largest circulation newspapers:

“All humans are descended from just TWO people…” (Emphasis theirs.) And it happened virtually yesterday in evolutionary time, somewhere around 100,000 years ago.

From the first line in the article (emphasis mine throughout): “All modern humans descended from a solitary pair.” From the second paragraph: “Scientists surveyed the genetic ‘bar codes’ of five million animals – including humans – from 100,000 different species and deduced that we sprang from a single pair of adults after a catastrophic event almost wiped out the human race.”

Now, to be sure, they are off on their timeline by about 94,000 years. They’ve got it right that there was a “catastrophic event that almost wiped out the human race,” which of course we know is actually a reference to the flood of Noah’s day, though they haven’t figured that part out yet. But give them time. They finally got to Adam and Eve, they’ll eventually come around on the rest.

Now these genetic scientists aren’t yahoos from East Pecan Community College. The report comes from “experts” at Rockefeller University and the University of Basel, Mark Stoeckle and David Thaler respectively.

Their findings are so contrary to current evolutionary thought that they found it almost impossible to believe. “This conclusion is very surprising,” said Thaler, “and I fought against it as hard as I could.”

Worse for those still stuck in the bankrupt cosmic swamp of Darwinianism, the same thing is true of animals, just exactly as the Bible says. In a statement that completely, utterly, and seismically destroys evolution, the scientists conclude that “ninety percent of all animal species alive today come from parents that all began giving birth at roughly the same time, less than 250 thousand years ago.” Well, “at roughly the same time” would be during the six days of creation, as recorded in Genesis 1.

The Daily Mail adds, this “throw[s] into doubt the patterns of human evolution.” No kidding.

This is a shocking, stupendous, mind-blowing departure from the addled thinking of today’s evolutionists, who believe the path to today’s animals began in the ancient slime and somehow all life, through infinitesimal steps, started in the primordial ooze. Nope.

Today’s animal species come from a single pair of ancestors, just like people do. “The research deduced that humans and animals sprang from [a] single pair — as did animals.”

In a commentary published by Fox News, Dr. Michael Guillen calls this “an astonishing discovery:”

“All humans alive today are the offspring of a common father and mother – an Adam and Eve – who walked the planet 100,000 to 200,000 years ago, which by evolutionary standards is like yesterday. Moreover, the same is true of nine out of every 10 animal species, meaning that nearly all of Earth’s creatures living today sprang into being recently from some seminal, Big Bang-like event.”

Hmmm. A “seminal, Big Bang-like event.” Say, perhaps, the creation of everything as recorded in Genesis 1?

Guillen draws two other evolution-shattering conclusions. First, he says, Stoeckle and Thaler’s study “does line up with the Bible…It affirms that we and our fellow creatures on Earth arose from a recent and profound creation event, orchestrated by some unknown mechanism” (God, maybe??). “Recent and profound creation event” – couldn’t have said it better myself.

Second, he adds, the DNA bar codes reveal that, ”Instead of there being a continuum of animal varieties, as one might expect from millions of years of gradual evolution, creatures fall into very distinct, widely separated populations,” exactly what the Bible says, when 11 times in Genesis 1, we are told that each created things reproduced “after its kind.”

It is impossible for there to be a conflict between good theology and good science. You can have a conflict between good theology and bad science, or bad theology and good science, but it is impossible to find a conflict between good theology and good science for the simple reason that God is the author of both.

Bottom line: once again, the best in science confirms the best in theology. Ladies and gentlemen, DO NOT DOUBT THE BOOK.


By Bryan Fischer

Follow me on Twitter: @BryanJFischer, on Facebook at “Focal Point”

Host of “Focal Point” on American Family Radio, 1:05 pm CT, M-F

(Unless otherwise noted, the opinions expressed are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Family Association or American Family Radio.)

6 thoughts on “Adam and Eve: Genetic Science Confirms Bible Again

  1. That particular study came to my attention not too long ago. Through my own research into the matter I have found that there was a study published in 2013 that shows that humanity has a genetic Adam and Eve, though they are (of course) very careful to point out that they think these two people very likely never knew each other, let alone mated. To my thinking, this makes little to no sense and strikes me as a bit of a scientific cop out.

    Based on the findings of the study you’ve posted here, I don’t see the Creation account of Genesis 1. What I do see is evidence for the flood, and here’s why I say that. Genesis 1 stipulates that ALL life was created in that one 6-day period. The study, however, stipulates that greater than 90% of all life appeared at roughly the same time. This, I think, speaks more to the Flood than Creation, especially when combined with geological evidence for the Flood, and the fact that so many different cultures throughout the world have their own flood myths.

    In all likelihood, nearly all life was wiped out in the Flood, with somewhere between 5%-10% of animal species (most likely aquatic animals) surviving. That leaves the remaining 90%+ originating from the animals carried on the Ark. For more information on this topic, I recommend clicking this link:

    Much of this material is what convinced me of the young-earth creationism. Once upon a time, I did believe in macroevolution and was an old-earth creationist. I’ve since seen the error of my ways. I credit the people who produced the documentary “Is Genesis History?”.


    • Thank you for adding all this.

      I smiled about what you said about the 2013 study where Adam and Eve may not have known each other.

      To me the young-earth creationism is the correct view.

      Thank you for adding the link for everyone to read more.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s